Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 380 U.S. 24 - Singer v. United States

Singer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

1,531
cited by 1,531 later decisions
57
cited 57 times by the Supreme Court
45
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

484 federal appellate · 41 district · 670 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,531 later decisions (57 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Faretta v. California (1975), Duncan v. State of Louisiana (1968)

484 federal appellate · 41 district · 670 state decisions — followed in 45 states

42001965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Patton v. United States · Thompson v. State of Utah

Cited together with Patton v. United States · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Johnson v. Zerbst · Sheppard v. Maxwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,531 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he ability to waive a constitutional right does not ordinarily carry with it the right to insist upon the opposite of that right.”
    90 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Cases required to be tried by jury shall be so tried unless the defendant waives a jury trial in writing with the approval of the court and the consent of the government.””
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We need not determine in this case whether there might be some circumstances where a defendant’s reasons for wanting to be tried by a judge alone are so compelling that the Government’s insistence on trial by jury would result in the denial to a defendant of an impartial trial.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.