380 U.S. 520
Docket No. 901.
GOLD ET AL. v. DICARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 26, 1965.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1965-04-26
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Cardwell, No. Cv 95 0556135-S (Jul. 31, 1997)
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1965-04-26
Cited by 52 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2003 · most notably Griswold v. State of Connecticut (1965), Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter (1966)
16 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Jesse Moss for appellants.
¶2Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.