Singleton v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
381 F.2d 1 · 1967
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2003 · most notably United States v. Allison (1969), United States ex rel. Placek v. Illinois (1976)
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))
Relies on Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Strachan Shipping Co. · United States v. First City National Bank of Houston · Hoffa v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We therefore hold that there was no prejudicial error in the evidentiary ruling which is challenged, although, at the same time, we reiterate our opinion that wide latitude in the right of cross-examination should always be afforded. Harris v. United States, 371 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1967); Carter v. United States, 373 F.2d 911 (9th Cir. 1967).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. United States
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.