Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 F.2d 147 - Maley v. Carroll

Maley v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

381 F.2d 147 · 1967

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1997

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

701967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United States · Edwards v. Douglas · Maule Industries, Inc. v. Gerstel · Farmers Warehouse of Pelham, Inc. v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While corporate entities may be disregarded where they are made the implement for avoiding a clear legislative purpose, they will not be disregarded where those in control have deliberately adopted the corporate form in order to secure its advantages and where no violence to the legislative purpose is done by treating the corporate entity as a separate legal per son. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United States, 326 U.S. 432, 437 , 66 S.Ct. 247, 249 , 90 L.Ed. 181, 184 (1946).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Courts are reluctant to pierce the corporate veil and destroy the important fiction under which so much of the business of the country is conducted, and will do so only under such compelling circumstances as require such action to avoid protecting fraud, or defeating public or private rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.