Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 F.2d 161 - McGarrah v. Dutton

McGarrah v. Dutton’s Empirical Analysis

381 F.2d 161 · 1967

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
June 1975
most recently cited

41 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Fay v. Noia · Carnley v. Cochran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The doctrine of comity requires that a federal habeas petitioner exhaust state court remedies that are available to him when he applies for federal habeas corpus relief. Fay v. Noia, 1963, 372 U.S. 391 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 . * * * Georgia has just enacted the new comprehensive post-conviction procedure * * *. Georgia has equipped itself with flexible adequate tools to meet Georgia’s responsibility in the vindication of federal constitutional rights in the trial of criminal cases. This is where it belongs.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any person imprisoned by virtue of a sentence imposed by a state court of record who asserts that in the proceedings which resulted in his conviction there was a substantial denial of his rights under the Constitution of the United States or of the State of Georgia or the laws of the State of Georgia may institute a proceeding under this section. * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ * * * tends to weaken state courts as instruments for the vindication of constitutional rights, with a resultant deterioration of federal system and federal-state relations.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.