Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 F.2d 168 - Adler v. Nicholas

Adler v. Nicholas’s Empirical Analysis

381 F.2d 168 · 1967

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co. (1971), Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Craton (1968)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

11019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on 64 So. 2d 281 - Underwood v. Underwood · Robert K. Mayo, as Trustees in Bankruptcy of Twin City Construction Company, Inc., Bankrupt v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Company · Vance v. Vance · 72 So. 2d 671 - Pross v. Pross · 79 So. 2d 426 - Clark v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to place itself in the situation of the parties, and from a consideration of the surrounding circumstances, the occasion, and apparent object of the parties, to determine the meaning and intent of the language employed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.