Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

381 F.2d 731

Docket No. 21605.

James William Collins v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

August 10, 1967.

Rehearing Denied September 15, 1967.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-08-10

1 counsel of record

Relies on Collins v. Wilson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-08-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1991

1 federal appellate ·

101967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James William Collins, in pro per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The appeal in this case is frivolous. Collins sues the Warden of San Quentin Prison, where he is an inmate, and the prison accountant, under the Civil Rights Act. He claims $50,000 damages because his opposition to an extension of time to file a brief, requested by the California Attorney General in Collins' pending appeal to this court in habeas corpus,1 was delayed in mailing for five days. This court granted the extension on March 25, 1966, the day on which Collins' opposition would have been mailed had there been no delay. Moreover, when the extension was granted, we had before us Collins' motion to hold the appellee in the habeas corpus case in default because his brief had not been filed in time, and we denied that motion on April 4, 1966. In short, Collins' contentions were brought to the attention of this court and were ruled upon. The delay in mailing caused Collins no legally cognizable damages.

¶2

Affirmed.

/381/f2d/731 · .json · Public domain