Cargill v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
381 F.2d 849 · 1967
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2002 · most notably United States v. Mandujano (1976), Harold Hanger v. United States of America, Gale Mixen v. United States of America, Loretta Meyer v. United States (1968)
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Jencks v. United States · Dennis v. United States · Weiler v. United States · United States v. Winter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The request was based only on the assertion of the appellant that such disclosure would serve the ends of justice or aid in the preparation for trial. These requests were much too broad and do not come within the Dennis rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““In a perjury prosecution the falsity of the statement must be established by the testimony of two independent witnesses or of one witness and corroborating circumstances.” 2 Wright, Fed. Practice and Procedure 74, § 404.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.