Eady v. Foerder’s Empirical Analysis
381 F.2d 980 · 1967
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Varhol v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (1990), Bailey v. Sharp (1986)
27 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc. · Wolfsohn v. Hankin · Duane Cooper, Doing Business as Hutchinson Farm Hatchery v. Midwest Feed Products Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'unique circumstances' present in the case at bar”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Leave to plaintiff to file any and all post trial motions with brief and written argument in support thereof within 30 days.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bailey v. Sharp · Bailey v. Sharp“was justifiable excuse for plaintiffs' failure to file their motion within ten days”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bailey v. Sharp · Bailey v. Sharp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.