Circle School v. Pappert’s Empirical Analysis
381 F.3d 172 · 2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same · West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Community Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 506 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969), the First Amendment's wide freedom in matters of adult public discourse has never meant that the First Amendment rights of students in the public schools are automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings. The Circle School v. Pappert, 381 F.3d 172, 177-78 (3d Cir.2004) (citing Bethel Sch. Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675, 682 , 106 S.Ct. 3159 , 92 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986)).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. C.N., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.N., a Minor L.M., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of V.M., a Minor M.E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.E., a Minor v. Ridgewood Board of Education Frederick J. Stokley Joyce Snider Ronald Verdicchio Robert Weakley John Mucciolo Anthony Bencivenga Sheila Brogan · Cn Jn Lm Vm Me Je v. Ridgewood Board of Education“shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. C.N., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.N., a Minor L.M., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of V.M., a Minor M.E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.E., a Minor v. Ridgewood Board of Education Frederick J. Stokley Joyce Snider Ronald Verdicchio Robert Weakley John Mucciolo Anthony Bencivenga Sheila Brogan · Cn Jn Lm Vm Me Je v. Ridgewood Board of Education“Certainly, the temporal duration of a burden on First Amendment rights is not determinative of whether there is a constitutional violation.... Similarly, the fact that the schools can issue a general disclaimer does not erase the First Amendment infringement at issue here, for the schools are still compelled to speak the [Government's] message.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.