Gil v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
381 F.3d 649 · 2004
Citation profile
32 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Pruitt v. Mote (2007), Greeno v. Daley (2005)
32 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Farmer v. Brennan · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Penson v. Ohio · Mabey v. Official Committee of Equity Security Holders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no expert testimony is needed when the symptoms exhibited are not beyond a layperson's grasp”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.