Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

381 F. App'x 264

In re Mack

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-06-03

Decided 2010-06-03

¶1Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Bennie A. Mack, Jr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his pro se motions to arrest judgment and to vacate *265judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied the motions. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4PETITION DENIED.

/381/fappx/264 · .json · Public domain