Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

381 F. App'x 683

Brown v. Holder

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 2, 2010

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-06-02

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Applies AZ 13 § 13-3401

Relies on Rendon v. Mukasey · United States v. Snellenberger

Decided 2010-06-02

¶1 MEMORANDUM …

¶2 Paul Brown, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petitions for review.

¶3 The record of conviction establishes that Brown was convicted of “Attempted Possession of Marijuana for Sale,” a felony, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-3401, 3405, 3418,1001, 301, 302, 303, 304, 701, 702, 702.01, and 801. See United States v. Snellenberger, 548 F.3d 699, 702 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc) (per curiam). The agency properly concluded that “Attempted Possession of Marijuana for Sale” contains a trafficking element and is therefore an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). See Rendon, 520 F.3d at *684 975-76. Accordingly, the agency did not err in finding Brown removable.

¶4 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

…

¶5 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

/381/fappx/683 · .json · Public domain