Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 F. Supp. 2d 405 - Sever v. Henderson

381 F. Supp. 2d 405 - Sever v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 115 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12113 (§ 103 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams · Bragdon v. Abbott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the court must determine whether the plaintiffs condition is a physical or mental impairment. 8 Second, the court must identify a life activity affected by the impairment and determine whether it Constitutes a ‘major life activity.’ Finally, the court must determine whether the plaintiff’s impairment had a substantial limit on the identified major life activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(h)(2); Sever, 381 F.Supp.2d at 413-14 . 10 . The Court also observes that a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(i) The nature and severity of the impairment; (ii) The duration or expected duration of the impairment; and (iii) The permanent or long term impact, or the expected permanent or long term impact of or resulting from the impairment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.