Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 Ill. 395 - Cahill v. Michael

Cahill v. Michael’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
2
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

2 district · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Barnhart v. Barnhart (1953), 26 Ill. 2d 406 - Weir v. Leafgreen (1962)

2 district · 53 state decisions

260194219501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Walker · Strauss v. Strauss · Himmel v. Himmel · Dollander v. Dhaemers · Pontius v. Conrad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “” ° The court will prefer any construction of a will to avoid intestacy. [Citations.] The presumption against intestacy is strong where there is a residuary clause. [Citations.] 0 0 0 The courts will endeavor to reconcile inconsistent or repugnant provisions rather than to ignore or declare both of them void. [Citations.] ° °”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The presumption against intestacy is strong where there is a residuary clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the other, by finding his presumed intention”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.