381 Ill. App. 3d 142 - People v. Sandoval’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 36 Ill. 2d 524 - The People v. Fosdick · 223 Ill. 2d 380 - People v. Cordell · 159 Ill. 2d 419 - People v. Staten · 226 Ill. 2d 334 - Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas · 183 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Quigley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`may not abrogate, limit or modify existing law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“adopt rules governing civil and criminal cases,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.