Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 Mass. 762 - Commonwealth v. Vickey

Commonwealth v. Vickey’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
5
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Sullivan v. Town of Brookline (2001), Commonwealth v. Galvin (1983)

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 54 state decisions

2001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Padilla-Martinez v. United States · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co. · Brady v. United States · Gurleski v. United States · Board of Education v. Assessor of Worcester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the statute appears not to provide for an eventuality, there is no justification for judicial legislation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he distinction between expungement of a record and sealing of a record is important.... The latter term refers to those steps taken to segregate certain records from the generality of records and to ensure their confidentiality to the extent specified in the controlling statute.”). As we stated in Fosher, an intent to benefit an offender”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The [Criminal History Systems Board] shall promulgate regulations . . . assuring the prompt and complete purging of criminal record information insofar as such purging is required ... by the order of any court of competent jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.