Mole v. Jutton’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2024
4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 8 Cal. 3d 229 - Cobbs v. Grant · Faya v. Almaraz · Sard v. Hardy · 58 Wis. 2d 569 - Trogun v. Fruchtman · Nizer v. Phelps
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a claim under the informed consent doctrine must be pled as a tort action for negligence, rather than as one for battery or assault.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) Generally . The filing of pleadings and other papers with the court as required by these rules shall be made by filing them with the clerk of the court, except that a judge of that court may accept the filing, in which event the judge shall note on the papers the filing date and forthwith transmit them to the office of the clerk.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hackney v. State“[a] person aware of the filing deadline, who acts reasonably to file pleadings timely, should not be at the mercy of the procedure set up by the Clerk's Office for its convenience.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hackney v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.