381 N.J. Super. 129 - Hardison v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · DiProspero v. Penn · 307 N.J. Super. 162 - Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Boylan · Oswin v. Shaw · Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Boylan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In our view, the need for [a] plaintiff to oppose summary judgment with comparative evidence when aggravation is not being claimed should not depend on any automatic application of Polk . Instead, the necessity for comparative evidence should depend upon whether the factual construct presented by the moving papers calls into question whether any reasonable jury could find that plaintiff incurred a permanent injury resulting from the subject automobile accident. [Ibid.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davidson v. Slater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.