381 N.J. Super. 22 - Davidson v. Slater’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In any event, while Dr. Dorfner does not, in his reports, compare the three accidents and their injuries, we are satisfied that a reasonable factfinder does not need him to opine that the August 2, 2001, accident uniquely caused a disc involvement that is permanent and distinct from the August 24, 1997, soft-tissue injuries and the January 12, 2003, soft-tissue injuries. Whether a jury will agree is not for us to say. [ Id. at 29-30, 884 A.2d 235 .]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Davidson v. Slater

2. “[t]o the extent Bennett v. Lugo, 368 N.J.Super. 466 , 847 A. 2d 14 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 180 N.J. 457 , 852 A. 2d 193 (2004), requires the [ Polk ] analysis `whether aggravation of prior injury is alleged or not,' id. at 473, 847 A. 2d 14 , we disagree.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 381 N.J. Super. 129 - Hardison v. King

3. “the comparative analysis requirement of Polk and its progeny engrafts an additional element upon [the statutory causation requirements] of the verbal threshold standard”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 381 N.J. Super. 129 - Hardison v. King