Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 P.2d 164 - Harrell v. State

Harrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 1978
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 85 Okla. Crim. 116 - Rogers v. State · 89 Okla. Crim. 205 - Dixon v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 386 - Maines v. State · 13 Okla. Crim. 71 - Cruzan v. State · Driskell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘In prosecutions for larceny, robbery, and burglary, an accomplice may be corroborated by proof of the possession of the stolen property by the defendant charged with the crime.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““No judgment shall be set aside or new trial granted by any appellate court of this State in any case, civil or criminal, on the ground of misdirection of the jury or the improper admission or rejection of evidence, or as to error in any ,matter of pleading or procedure, unless, in the opinion of the court to which application is made, after an examination of the entire record, it appears that the error complained of has probably resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or constitutes a substantial violation of a constitutional or statutory right.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Court of Criminal Appeals will not modify a sentence alleged to be excessive unless it is convinced from an examination of the entire record that the verdict and sentence based thereon was manifestly excessive and apparently given under passion and prejudice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.