Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 P.2d 900 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2010

6 state decisions

40196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 81 Okla. Crim. 351 - Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When it appears to court having jurisdiction to issue writ of prohibition that lower court, under any conditions, lacks jurisdiction to try accused upon indictment or information filed, with all amendments permitted under law considered made, and same conclusion as to lack of jurisdiction would be reached on appeal if defendant were convicted, writ of prohibition will be granted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We believe it is obvious that conspiracy to defraud a city or county of money or property is not a conspiracy to defraud the state of Oklahoma; and,, we are therefore of the opinion, that an action cannot be instituted for con spiracy to defraud a county or political subdivision of the state more than three years 'after its commission’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Their failure so to do is a clear indication that it was the legislature’s intent that prosecution for conspiring ■to defraud a county, city, school district, etc., should be commenced within three years 'after its commission’ ”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.