Laner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1975
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Villa v. Thayer · Mossman v. Bostridge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no law in Oklahoma that gives a person the right to shoot a dog for chasing deer, and until such a law is en acted, we must consider the action taken by the defendant to be in violation of 21 O.S.1961 § 1685. This Court certainly does not condone the killing of deer by packs of dogs that are left to run wild by their owners. However, in the instant case we do not feel that this was true. These were trained wolf hounds that were running a wolf trail and the defendant admitted shooting them and then driving off. He did not even take the time to see if they had been killed outright. He knew that he had hit the dogs and he was willing to let them drag themselves off and suffer and die. The trial court felt that this was cruelty to animals, and we can but agree.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maloney v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.