381 Pa. Super. 149 - Commonwealth v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Braverman v. United States · Frohwerk v. United States · LaRocca v. United States · 315 Pa. Super. 281 - Commonwealth v. Ford · United States v. Continental Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in the complaint tends to establish separate conspiracies to distribute cocaine and marijuana or tends to disprove that a single conspiratorial relationship existed from which both marijuana and cocaine were distributed to the Walters in Pennsylvania.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Conspiracy with multiple criminal objectives. — If a person conspires to commit a number of crimes, he is guilty of only one conspiracy so long as such multiple crimes are the object of the same agreement or continuous conspiratorial relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.