381 Pa. Super. 428 - Young v. Eastern Engineering & Elevator Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and Developers (1996), 387 Pa. Super. 56 - Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc. (1989)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 37 Ill. 2d 273 - Miller v. DeWitt · Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com. · SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. · Day v. National US Radiator Corporation · Coffey v. Derby Steel Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an architect is not under a duty to notify workers or employees of the contractor or subcontractor of hazardous conditions on the construction site.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It would appear that an architect who, acting as an independent contractor, plans and supervises construction work is under a duty to exercise ordinary care in doing so in order to protect any person who foreseeably and with reasonable certainty may be injured by his failure to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.