Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 SO2D 1333 - Roberts v. Roberts

Roberts v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2002

20 state decisions

110198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kirby v. Kent · In re the Estate of Lee · Clark v. Castner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he rules applicable to the construction of written contracts in general are to be applied in construing a post-nuptial agreement. Such a contract must be considered as a whole, and from such examination the intent of the parties must be gathered. Such construction should be given the agreement, if possible, as will render all of its clauses harmonious, so as to carry into effect the actual purpose and intent of the parties as derived therefrom.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is not contingent upon either party procuring a divorce.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.