381 So. 2d 276 - Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 268 So. 2d 173 - Pope v. State · 296 So. 2d 609 - Amato v. State · 283 So. 2d 99 - Metropolitan Dade Cty. Ta v. State Dept. Hs & Mv · 378 So. 2d 111 - Murray v. State · Sharp v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the first offense is the possession or delivery without consideration of not more than 5 grams of cannabis, that person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 and s. 775.083. For purposes of this subsection, “cannabis” shall not include the resin extracted from the plant Cannabis sativa, L., or any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such resin.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Retherford v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.