¶1Affirmed. There is competent substantial evidence to support the conviction of appellant for violation of the zoning ordinance which makes no provisions for the operation/maintenance of a church or synagogue in an RS-4 District; that is, a neighborhood that consists of single-family detached dwelling units. See Town v. State, 377 So.2d 648 (Fla.1979); Pylant v. Orange County, 328 So.2d 199 (Fla.1976); Smith v. City of Miami Beach, 213 So.2d 281 (Fla.3d DCA 1968), cert. discharged, 220 So.2d 624 (Fla.1969); City of Miami Beach v. Greater Miami Hebrew Academy, 108 So.2d 50 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 113 So.2d 229 (Fla.1959); Miami Beach United Lutheran Church of the Epiphany v. City of Miami Beach, 82 So.2d 880 (Fla.1955); Sections 6-1A, 6-1B 1 and 14-1(d) of the City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinance No. 1891.
381 So. 2d 316
Grosz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 18, 1980
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-03-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1983
1 state decisions
Relies on 213 So. 2d 281 - Smith v. City of Miami Beach · 82 So. 2d 880 - MIAMI BEACH UNITED LUTH. CH. v. City of Miami Beach · 377 So. 2d 648 - Town v. State Ex Rel. Reno
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-03-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →