381 So. 2d 485 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
75 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis (1994), State v. Brown (2005)
75 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Bram v. United States · Hutto v. Ross · 364 So. 2d 964 - State v. Weinberg · Yeager v. Farwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not whether a confession was induced by improper external forces but whether the confession was free and voluntary and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menace, threats, inducements or promises.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“" The United States Supreme Court has held that confessions obtained by `any direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence' is involuntary and inadmissible as a matter of constitutional law. Bram v. United States ... 168 U.S. 532, 542-543 , 18 S.Ct. 183 [186-187], 42 L.Ed. 568 (1897) . The rationale of Bram is that even slight inducements held out by a person in authority such as a police officer or prosecuting attorney may render a confession involuntary because the person accused would believe that such an authoritative person is credible and in a position to give effect to the inducement ....."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Haynie · State v. Scott“`any direct or implied promises, however slight, [or] by the exertion of any improper influence'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.