Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 So. 2d 94 - Ex Parte Hill

381 So. 2d 94 - Ex Parte Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 357 So. 2d 662 - Chavers v. State Personnel Bd. · Ex Parte State Personnel Bd. · 381 So. 2d 91 - Hill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because of the failure of the attendance officer to give written notice in accordance with the strict and literal requirement of the statute, we hold that an essential element of the State's case against [the appellant] is missing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.