Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 381 SW3D 74 - Mitchell v. Ramsey

Mitchell v. Ramsey’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on George v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. · Dupwe v. Wallace · McMickle v. Griffin · Craig v. Traylor · 2010 Ark. App. 459 - Bisbee v. Decatur State Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A party must assume a position clearly inconsistent with a position taken in an earlier case, or with a position taken in the same case; 2. A party must assume the inconsistent position with the intent to manipulate the judicial process to gain an unfair advantage; 3. A party must have successfully maintained the position in an earlier proceeding such that the court relied upon the position taken; and 4.The integrity of the judicial process of at least one court must be impaired or injured by the inconsistent positions taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.