In Re Cormier’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 2075
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Butner v. United States · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · United States v. American Trucking Associations
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The unstated premise in Taylor is limited: when a debtor claims property as fully exempt, and no objection is timely filed, the property is exempt. However, other than this premise, the Supreme Court was not called upon to interpret the exemption statute, including § 522(d), nor did it even discuss it, except perhaps in passing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e are persuaded generally that a debtor’s listing of an exemption in an amount sufficient to exempt all of the available (¿a, unencumbered) value in the property indicates his or her intent to exempt the property in full.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In Re Erickson“Based upon the explicit statutory language and the melange of interpretation principles, this court believes that § 522(d)(5) does not contemplate any “in-kind” exemption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Erickson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.