Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 F.2d 353 - Johnson v. Avery

Johnson v. Avery’s Empirical Analysis

382 F.2d 353 · 1967

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 1993
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1993 · most notably Johnson v. Avery (1969), Walker v. Hughes (1977)

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

1501967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Escobedo v. Illinois · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . the well-established reluctance of the Federal Courts to intervene in internal affairs of state or Federal penal institutions. Regulations for the administration and discipline of prisons, promulgated and enforced by duly authorized officials, are not subject to review by the courts unless it can be clearly demonstrated that they interfere with fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. This proposition is soundly based on the fact that prison administration is a function of the executive branch of the Government and one for which the courts, with their limited experience and facilities, are ill-suited to undertake.” 8”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.