Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 F.3d 1206 - Alexander v. Oklahoma

Alexander v. Oklahoma’s Empirical Analysis

382 F.3d 1206 · 2004

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 23 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · United States v. Kubrick · Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio · State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Mhoon · Gff Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]he statute of limitations begins to run when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the existence and cause of the injury which is the basis of his action.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to convert the District Court's Rule 12(b)(6) order to one for summary judgment, we must find that the District Court relied on [external] material in rendering its decision”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.