Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 F.3d 318 - Shardar v. Ashcroft

Shardar v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

382 F.3d 318 · 2004

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
March 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Borges v. Gonzales (2005), Voci v. Gonzales (2005)

23 federal appellate ·

740200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Saideh Fisher v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Dia v. Ashcroft · Abdulai v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude the contrary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “‘Whether a petitioner has demonstrated past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution is a factual question that is reviewed by this court under a substantial evidence standard, and will be upheld to the extent it is supported by ‘reasonable, substantial and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]s a general matter ... fear of prosecution for violations of `fairly administered laws' does not itself qualify one as a `refugee' or make one eligible for withholding of deportation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.