Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 F.3d 68 - Servisensecom Inc Llc v. R

Servisensecom Inc Llc v. R’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc. · Wt Grant Company Cosoff v. G Rodman Wt · In re Public Ledger, Inc. · Jeffrey v. Desmond · Hicks, Muse & Co. v. Brandt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The probability of success in the litigation; (b) the difficulties, if any, to be encountered in the matter of collection; (c) the complexity of the litigation involved, and the expense, inconvenience and delay necessarily attending it; (d) the paramount interest of the creditors and a proper deference to their reasonable views. . . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “canvass the issues and [determine] whether the settlement falls below the lowest point in the range of reasonableness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “On motion by the trustee and after notice and a hearing, the court may approve a compromise or settlement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.