Golembiewski v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
382 F.3d 721 · 2004
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Golembiewski v. Barnhart · Marcus v. Shalala · Friends of Boundary Waters Wilderness v. Thomas Fb · United States of America v. Hallmark Construction Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court has described the substantial justification standard as requiring that the government show that its position was grounded in (1) a reasonable basis in truth for the facts alleged; (2) a reasonable basis in law for the theory propounded; and (3) a reasonable connection between the facts alleged and the legal theory propounded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jenkins v. Astrue“Strong language against the government's position in an opinion [of a reversing appellate court] discussing the merits of a key issue is evidence in support of an award of EAJA fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dixon v. Comm'r“closed with an additional observation,” admonishing the ALJ to consider the aggregate of the plaintiff's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.