382 F. Supp. 1313 - Dyer v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Carrington v. Rash · Manard v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is nothing wrong or even suspect in registration officials asking college boarding students, whose permanent addresses are outside the county, certain questions to determine residency and their qualifications.” Dyer v. Huff, 382 F. Supp. 1313, 1316 (D.S.C. 1973), aff’d without opinion, 506 F. 2d 1397 (4th Cir. 1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lloyd v. Babb““It is doubtful that any court has the wisdom to compose a, list of questions which could be used by a registration board in determining every issue of residency that might be presented.” Dyer v. Huff, supra, 382 F. Supp. at 1316 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lloyd v. Babb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.