Nurriddin v. Goldin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

68 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[w]hen racial statements are not made directly to a plaintiff, generally a hostile environment cannot be established”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Cooper v. Nielsen · Doe v. George Wash. Univ.

2. “Everyone can be characterized by sex, race, ethnicity, or (real or perceived) disability; and many bosses are harsh, unjust, and rude. It is therefore important in hostile work environment cases to exclude from consideration personnel decisions that lack a linkage of correlation to the claimed ground of discrimination. Otherwise, the federal courts will become a court of personnel appeals.'') (quoting Alfano v. Costello, 294 F.3d 365, 377 (2d Cir.2002)); Ware v. Billington, 344 F.Supp.2d 63 , 71 n. 1 (D.D.C.2004) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 851 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Brooks v. Grundmann

3. “(1) he is a member of a protected class; (2) he was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3) the harassment occurred because of his race; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of his employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment, but failed to take any action to prevent it.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Brady v. Livingood