Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 NJSUPER 113 - State v. Camillo

State v. Camillo’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · State v. Lashinsky · State v. Smith · State v. Alexander · State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits an offense if he purposely obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other governmental function or prevents or attempts to prevent a public servant from lawfully performing an official function by means of flight, intimidation, force, violence, or physical interference or obstacle, or by means of any independently unlawful act. This section does not apply to failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, or any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental functions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to prohibit a broad range of behavior designed to impede or defeat the lawful operation of government,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “may, in fact, have in a real sense obstructed the trooper from preparing his report”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.