Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 NW2D 279 - State v. Olson

State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2001

6 state decisions

40198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Aarsvold · State v. Wicks · State v. Sauer · State v. Barutt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.04, subd. 1(1), states: The prosecuting attorney may appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals: (1) * * * from any pj-etriai or(jer 0f the trial court except an order dismissing a complaint for lack of probable cause to believe the defendant has committed an offense or an order dismissing a complaint pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 631.21 * * *.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.