Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 N.W.2d 623 - State v. Indvik

State v. Indvik’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Waupekenay (1992), State v. Gregg (2000)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

1701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Berkemer v. McCarty · Ake v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Indvik's independent and intervening actions of engaging the officer in a high-speed chase, running from the police officers into the woods, drawing a firearm on the police officers—and actually firing it— break the chain of causation and dissipate the taint of the prior illegality, i.e., the invalid stop.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The question is whether or not a reasonable person in the officer’s position would be justified by some objective manifestation to suspect the defendant was, or was about to be, engaged in criminal activity.” Indvick, 382 N.W.2d at 627 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “no choice, for to choose not to stop is to have committed a crime.” Id. 6 . We use the term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.