Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 Pa. 72 - Commonwealth v. Capps

Commonwealth v. Capps’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
March 1975
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 1975 · most notably Commonwealth v. Dickerson (1962), Commonwealth v. Petrakovich (1974)

35 state decisions

140195519601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Simmons · Commonwealth v. Exler · Commonwealth v. Neill · Commonwealth v. Gibbs · Commonwealth v. Crittenton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The first alleged trial error is the refusal of the court below to grant defendant's requests for continuance and change of venue. At the request of defendant's counsel the trial fixed during the week of March 22, 1954, was continued until April 26, a period of three months after date of the killing. The learned trial Judge ruled that the newspaper stories were not so inflammatory and biased in factual presentation as to cause, or be evidence of, public prejudice or hysteria. The granting, or refusing, of a change of venue or continuance, is within the sound discretion of the trial court: Commonwealth v. Simmons, 361 Pa. 391 , 65 A. 2d 353 , and the many cases cited therein. We have reviewed all the evidence and do not regard that the trial Judge abused his discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.