Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 So. 2d 1095 - State v. Davis

382 So. 2d 1095 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2007

16 state decisions

90198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 383 So. 2d 489 - Turner v. State · 336 So. 2d 721 - Harrington v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In 57 A.L.R.2d 303 , 306, Waiver or Loss of Accused Right to Speedy Trial (1958), appears the following: A majority of the cases hold that by failing to demand a trial, or by failing to make some effort to procure a speedier trial than that actually accorded to him by the state, accused waives his right to trial within the period prescribed by the statute, this being particularly true when accused is on bail. And it has been expressly pointed out that a failure to demand trial within the period prescribed by the statute will defeat a motion for discharge even though the statute does not expressly make such demand a requirement. And in the absence of an affirmative request or demand for trial it will be presumed that defendant acquiesced in the delay.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Unless good cause be shown, and a continuance duly granted by the court, all offenses for which indictments are presented to the court shall be tried no later than two hundred seventy (270) days after the accused has been arraigned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he delay resulting from this continuance cannot be considered as having been without good cause, especially in the absence of any showing in the record to the contrary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.