Fields v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Preston v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he search was in no way an incident to the arrest. Nor can the vacuuming of the interior of Fields' automobile be considered a measure reasonably connected with an effort on the part of the officers to protect themselves, the car or its contents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]here was ample time to obtain a warrant and no probability that the automobile could be removed beyond the reach of the officers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.