Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 So. 2d 11 - Allen v. State

382 So. 2d 11 - Allen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1988
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 42 Ala. App. 498 - Isbell v. State · Smith v. State · 42 Ala. App. 499 - Pugh v. State · 337 So. 2d 742 - Comer v. City of Mobile · 38 Ala. App. 434 - Holloway v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Where there is legal evidence from which the jury can by fair inference find the defendant guilty, the Court of Criminal Appeals has no right to disturb the verdict; whether there is such evidence is a question of law, its weight and probative value are for the jury.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “indulge every presumption in favor of the correctness thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.