Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 382 So. 2d 1321 - Uber v. State

382 So. 2d 1321 - Uber v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2000

6 state decisions

30198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maddox v. State · 313 So. 2d 433 - Board of Regents v. Videon · Masters v. State · Rosengarten v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not go forward with the evidence much less show a lack of criminal intent on his part. The sum total of his showing of a lack of criminal intent was his counsel's questioning of the only two state witnesses, Jones (the victim) and Deputy Carroll, regarding what they thought was in Bartlett's mind when he went on to Jones' property less than 24 hours after he had been told by Jones not to do so. At best, counsel's characterization of the taking of the truck Jones had paid for as a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.