382 So. 2d 627 - Renfroe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. United States · Shadle v. State · Seals v. State · 52 Ala. App. 260 - Barnett v. State · 370 So. 2d 323 - Winnings v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'. . . the granting of a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court, for he, being present, is in a much better position to determine what effect, if any, some occurrence may have upon the jury's ability to decide the defendant's fate fairly and justly. And we will not interfere with the trial judge unless there had been a clear abuse of discretion. . . .'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Witnesses may always be allowed to testify as to the appearance and emotions of other persons.' Hamilton v. State , 281 Ala. 448 , 203 So.2d 684 (1967); Garraway v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 337 So.2d 1349 (1976); Beard v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 337 So.2d 1372 (1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Even though the accused offers sufficient and proper evidence of another's guilt to render it admissible, such evidence may still, within the discretion of the trial court, be held inadmissible upon the ground of its being too remote from the crime in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.