Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

382 So. 2d 650

Florida Bar

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 21, 1980

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1980-02-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-02-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2010

4 state decisions

401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ALDERMAN, Justice,

¶1concurring in part, dissenting in part.

¶2I concur with the majority decision denying Pahules’ petition for reinstatement without prejudice but dissent to that portion of the decision declining to assess the Florida Bar’s costs against Pahules. Normally where the Bar prevails, as it did in this case, the costs of the proceedings are taxed against the suspended lawyer. It is unfair to the other members of the Bar to require them to bear the costs which were incurred as a result of Pahules’ misconduct.

/382/so2d/650 · .json · Public domain