Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

382 So. 2d 765

Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-04-02

Relies on 371 So. 2d 556 - Johnson v. State · 373 So. 2d 450 - Proctor v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-04-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2008

13 state decisions

90198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile convicted of a crime, make findings of fact and set forth reasons showing those sanctions to be in conformity with the criteria of Section 39.111(6)(c). The record here reveals that the trial judge failed to refer to all of the six criteria mentioned in that section when he sentenced appellant.

¶2We affirm, the judgment of the trial court, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.-111(6). See Proctor v. State, 373 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 371 So.2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
/382/so2d/765 · .json · Public domain